Link to home

First Report of Zucchini yellow mosaic virus in Watermelon in Bosnia and Herzegovina

June 2014 , Volume 98 , Number  6
Pages  858.1 - 858.1

V. Trkulja, D. Jošić Kovačić, and J. Mihić Salapura, Department of Plant Protection, Agricultural Institute of Republic of Srpska, Knjaza Miloša 17, 78000 Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina; and I. Stanković, A. Vučurović, A. Bulajić, and B. Krstić, Institute of Phytomedicine, Department of Phytopathology, University of Belgrade-Faculty of Agriculture, Nemanjina 6, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia. This research was partly supported by the grant III 43001 of the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technological Development, Republic of Serbia and FP7 Project Area 316004



Go to article:
Accepted for publication 6 January 2014.

Several potyvirus species cause severe economic losses in cucurbit crops in the Mediterranean region, but Zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV) is regarded as one of the most destructive (2,3). In June 2012, field-grown watermelon plants (Citrullus lanatus [Thunb.] Matsum and Nakai) showing mild to severe mosaic, mottling, and bubbling followed by leaf deformation with blistering were observed in the Kukulje locality (Region of Banja Luka) in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Incidence of virus infection in the field was visually estimated at 15%. Symptomatic watermelon plants were collected and tested for the presence of the most prevalent watermelon viruses including ZYMV, Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), Watermelon mosaic virus (WMV), Papaya ringspot virus (PRSV), and Squash mosaic virus (SqMV) (1) using commercial double-antibody sandwich (DAS)-ELISA diagnostic kits (Bioreba AG, Reinach, Switzerland). Commercial positive and negative controls were included in each assay. Of the 14 watermelon plants tested, all were positive for ZYMV and negative for WMV, CMV, PRSV, and SqMV. Sap prepared from an ELISA-positive sample (isolate 314-12) and healthy watermelon plants, using 0.01 M phosphate buffer (pH 7) was mechanically inoculated onto five carborundum-dusted plants of each Chenopodium quinoa and Citrullus lanatus ‘Creamson sweet’. Mechanically inoculated C. quinoa plants exhibited chlorotic spots 5 days post-inoculation, while severe mosaic accompanied by crinkling and leaf deformation were observed on all inoculated watermelon plants 12 days post-inoculation. For further confirmation of the virus identity, total RNAs from all 14 naturally and 5 mechanically infected watermelon plants were extracted with the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and subjected by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR. RT-PCR was carried out with One-Step RT-PCR Kit (Qiagen) using ZYMV-specific primer pair, CPfwd and CPrev (4), designed to amplify an 1,100-bp fragment covering the entire coat protein (CP) gene and part of the nuclear inclusion (NIb) and 3′-UTR. Total RNAs obtained from the Serbian ZYMV isolate from winter squash (GenBank Accession No. JN315861) and tissue sample from healthy watermelon leaves were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. The expected size of the RT-PCR product was amplified from each of the watermelon plants assayed confirming serological virus identification. One amplicon derived from isolate 314-12 was purified (QIAquick PCR Purification Kit, Qiagen) and sequenced directly (KF836440). Sequence analysis of the complete CP gene, conducted by MEGA5 software, revealed that watermelon isolate from Bosnia and Herzegovina showed the highest nucleotide identity of 99.8% (99.6% amino acid identity) with 14 ZYMV isolates originating from different hosts from Serbia (HM072431, JF308189 to 90, JN315856 to 57, JN315859 to 61) and Austria (AJ420012 to 17). To our knowledge, this is the first report of ZYMV in Bosnia and Herzegovina, which is an important discovery. It represents expansion of this virus to new geographical area. Considering that the ZYMV is among the most devastating pathogens of cucurbits (3), further survey is needed to determine its distribution in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

References: (1) L. M. da Silveira et al. Trop. Plant Pathol. 34:123, 2009. (2) H. Lecoq et al. Virus Res. 141:190, 2009. (3) H. Lecoq and C. Desbiez. Adv. Virus Res. 84:67, 2012. (4) M. F. Pfosser and H. Baumann. Arch. Virol. 147:1599, 2002.



Copyright © 2014 The American Phytopathological Society