ABSTRACT
Selected olive (Olea europaea) cultivars were tested in the field and laboratory for their relative susceptibility to anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum acutatum. A rating scale to assess fruit-rot incidence in naturally infected trees was validated by comparing ratings with direct counts of affected fruit. Fruit-rot incidence varied greatly among 20 cultivars and was correlated with the severity of branch dieback symptoms that developed after fruit-rot epidemics. For determining whether artificial inoculation can be used to predict anthracnose susceptibility in the orchard, detached fruit of 12 cultivars were inoculated with C. acutatum and fruit-rot severity was assessed periodically. Progress of disease severity over time fit the logistic function for all cultivars. The best correlation between fruit-rot incidence in the field and disease severity on inoculated fruit was obtained using a disease susceptibility index that integrated the maximum disease progress rate and the estimated time to reach 50% disease severity. Based on field observations and laboratory data on susceptibility to anthracnose, 21 cultivars were classified into three groups: highly susceptible (Cornicabra, Hojiblanca, Lechín de Sevilla, Manzanilla de Sevilla, Morona, Ocal, Picudo, and Verdial de Huévar); moderately susceptible (Arbequina, Arbosana, Morrut, Pajarero, and Villalonga); and resistant (Blanqueta, Empeltre, Frantoio, Koroneiki, Leccino, Morona-D, Picual, and Razzola). The assessment method may be useful to screen olive cultivars for anthracnose resistance.
