Previous View
 
APSnet Home
 
Phytopathology Home


VIEW ARTICLE

Disease Control and Pest Management

Mechanisms Involved in Biological Control of Fusarium Wilt of Cucumber with Strains of Nonpathogenic Fusarium oxysporum. Qaher Mandeel, Department of Plant Pathology and Weed Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523; Ralph Baker, Department of Plant Pathology and Weed Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523. Phytopathology 81:462-469. Accepted for publication 17 December 1990. Copyright 1991 The American Phytopathological Society. DOI: 10.1094/Phyto-81-462.

Two nonpathogenic strains of Fusarium oxysporum (C5 and C14) introduced into soil at 1.08 104 and 5 104 colony-forming units (cfu) per gram of soil significantly decreased the slope values of inoculum density-disease incidence curves generated for Fusarium wilt of cucumber induced by F. oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum. Strain C14 reduced disease significantly more than C5. A three-phase mechanism was associated with biological control of Fusarium wilt by these agents. There was a significant reduction in germination of chlamydospores of F. o. cucumerinum in the rhizospheres of cucumbers infested with C5 or C14. Competition for infection sites with F. o. cucumerinum was demonstrated in soil infested with C14 but not C5. Enhanced systemic resistance of the host to inoculation with F. o. cucumerinum or Colletotrichum lagenarium occurred when wounded or nonwounded roots were exposed to C14. Strain C5 significantly reduced disease induced by F. o. cucumerinum in similar experiments only if roots were wounded when the agents were introduced. When roots were exposed to either C5 or C14 and microconidia of F. o. cucumerinum applied to transversely severed stems of cucumber, significant reduction in germination of the pathogen occurred 7296 hr after introduction of the biocontrol agents; however, wounding of roots was necessary for C5 to induce the response. Therefore, mechanisms of suppression of Fusarium wilt of cucumber by these nonpathogenic agents involved competition in the rhizosphere and infection sites, as well as induction of enhanced resistance in the host. Apparently, the ability of C14 to compete for infection sites, penetrate through intact root tissue, colonize the host, and induce resistance reactions in the host were attributes that contributed to its superior performance in biological control in comparison with C5.