Link to home

First Report of Powdery Mildew (Podosphaera pannosa) of Roses in Sinaloa, Mexico

October 2014 , Volume 98 , Number  10
Pages  1,442.2 - 1,442.2

R. Félix-Gastélum, G. Herrera-Rodríguez, and C. Martínez-Valenzuela, Universidad de Occidente, Unidad Los Mochis, Depto. de Ciencias Biológicas, Sinaloa, México, CP 81223; I. E. Maldonado-Mendoza and F. R. Quiroz-Figueroa, Departamento de Biotecnología Agrícola, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigación para el Desarrollo Integral Regional-IPN Unidad Sinaloa, Guasave, Sinaloa, México, CP 81101; H. Brito-Vega, Departamento de Biotecnología Agrícola, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigación para el Desarrollo Integral Regional-IPN Unidad Sinaloa, Guasave, Sinaloa, México, CP 81101, and Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco, División de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Tabasco, México, CP 86000; and S. Espinosa-Matías, Laboratorio de Microscopía Electrónica de Barrido, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Ciencias, Coyoacán, México, D.F. (México) CP 04510



Go to article:
Accepted for publication 15 July 2014.

Rose (Rosa spp.) is the most important ornamental plant cultivated in greenhouse and open fields in Mexico but its quality has been limited by powdery mildew (PM). High incidence and disease damage is common during winter in Sinaloa, Mexico (temperature range 18 to 25°C and prolonged episodes of relative humidity ≥90%). The fungus attacks leaves and flowers and grows abundantly on the pedicels, sepals, and receptacles, especially when the flower bud is unopened (2). Field advisors in Mexico have referred to Sphaerotheca pannosa (Wallr. ex Fr.) Lév. as a causal agent of the disease. However, there has not been solid scientific evidence to support this statement. Morphometric and molecular analysis were conducted to elucidate the identity of the fungal isolates collected from 2012 through 2013 in northern Sinaloa. PM specimens included eight different rose varieties. Conidiophores and conidia were observed under a compound microscope. The mycelium had a mean diameter of 4.7 to 6.0 μm; conidiophores (Euoidium type) 2 to 5 celled, occasionally 6 celled emerged from the superficial mycelium; conidiophores were unbranched with conidia produced in chains from the apex. The average length of the conidiophores was 54.9 to 98.0 μm; the foot cell of the conidiophores was straight and was 24.9 to 53.6 μm long with a diameter from 8.2 to 9.8 μm across its medium part. Conidia originated from unswollen conidiogenous cells, with fibrosin bodies, formed in long chains, and were cylindrical to ovoid, 25.8 to 30.4 μm long and 13.9 to 17.3 μm wide. The outline of the conidial chains was crenate. Conidia exhibited a slight constriction at one end. The germ tubes emerged from a shoulder of the conidia. The outer wall of partially collapsed conidia showed longitudinal and transversal wrinkling and slight constrictions at the ends; the terminal end of the conidia was concentrically ridged. For molecular characterization, the ITS region of the specimens was amplified with primers ITS1F and ITS4. Phylogenetic analysis was performed with MEGA 6.0 (bootstrap = 1,000) using Kimura 2 parameter (K2P) substitution model. The resulting phylogeny grouped our specimens (GenBank KM001665 to 69) within a clade of Podosphaera pannosa (Wall.: Fr.) de Bary (formerly known as Sphaerotheca pannosa) sequences (e.g., AB525938; bootstrap (1,000) = 98). Phylogenetic and morphometric data are in agreement with descriptions of the anamorphic P. pannosa (1,3). Morphological studies indicate that P. macularis (previously known as S. humuli) and P. pannosa are not indistinctly different (2). Phylogenetic analysis showed relationship to P. pannosa, but not to P. macularis. Typical symptoms caused by P. pannosa were observed. Morphological studies (4) reported the anamorph of P. pannosa on Rosa spp. in central Mexico. To date, no report exists on the molecular identification of P. pannosa associated to roses in northern Sinaloa, Mexico. Future research directions should focus on finding the teleomorph of the fungus to support its identity, and to explore disease management tools such as effective fungicides and developing resistant rose cultivars.

References: (1) U. Braun et al. Page 13 in: The Powdery Mildews: A Comprehensive Treatise. APS Press, St. Paul, MN, 2002. (2) R. K. Horst. Compendium of Rose Diseases. APS Press, St. Paul, MN, 1983. (3) L. Leus et al. J. Phytopathol. 154:23, 2006. (4) Yañez-Morales et al. Some new reports and new species of powdery mildew from Mexico. Schlechtendalia 19:46, 2009.



Copyright © 2014 The American Phytopathological Society