Link to home

Bacterial Canker of Sweet Cherry in Oregon—Infection of Horticultural and Natural Wounds, and Resistance of Cultivar and Rootstock Combinations

March 2010 , Volume 94 , Number  3
Pages  345 - 350

Robert A. Spotts and Kelly M. Wallis, Mid-Columbia Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Oregon State University, Hood River 97031; and Maryna Serdani, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology and Anita N. Azarenko, Department of Horticulture, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331



Go to article:
Accepted for publication 24 November 2009.
ABSTRACT

This study was done to (i) compare seven types of natural or horticultural injuries and wounds for incidence, severity, and mortality of infection of sweet cherry (Prunus avium) by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae; (ii) determine the relative resistance to bacterial canker of 14 cultivar--rootstock combinations; (iii) determine if P. syringae pv. syringae is transmitted by contaminated pruning tools; and (iv) determine if summer and winter pruning cuts become resistant to infection. Infection occurred at all of the seven types of injury and wound sites on both cvs. Sunset Bing and Golden Heart. Infection of inoculated wounds made in spring and summer (heading cuts when trees were planted, scoring cuts, and summer pruning) resulted in the greatest canker incidence and severity. Inoculation of heading cuts resulted in the highest tree mortality (86%). ‘Bing’ and ‘Sweetheart’ were the most susceptible cultivars while ‘Regina’ and ‘Rainier’ appeared to be more resistant. Bing trees had the highest mortality of any cultivar with 70% dead at the end of the 3-year study. Canker severity of the three rootstocks varied considerably but mortality was greatest for trees on Gisela 6 (77%). Bacterial canker was not transmitted in summer or winter by cutting through active cankers, then immediately using the same pruning tool to make heading cuts on healthy trees. Heading cuts became resistant to infection after about 1 week in summer and 3 weeks in winter. Results are discussed as part of an integrated management program for bacterial canker of sweet cherry.



© 2010 The American Phytopathological Society