Link to home

Formation of Phytophthora infestans Oospores in Nature on Tubers in Central Mexico

January 2002 , Volume 86 , Number  1
Pages  73.3 - 73.3

S. P. Fernández-Pavía , PICTIPAPA/CEEM, Apdo. Postal 3-12, Metepec 52176, Mexico ; N. J. Grünwald , USDA ARS, 24106 N. Bunn Rd., Prosser, WA 99350 ; and W. E. Fry , Department of Plant Pathology, Cornell University, 334 Plant Science Building, Ithaca, NY 14853



Go to article:
Accepted for publication 26 October 2001.

Oospore formation by Phytophthora infestans in nature has been detected on potato leaflets in central Mexico (1), but there are no reports of oospore formation on tubers. A severe late blight epidemic occurred in Calimaya, Mexico, in fields where potato cv. Alpha was planted during the summer of 2000. Yield was reduced despite numerous applications of fungicide. Four hundred potato tubers left in the field were collected from the upper 10 cm of soil and examined for late blight symptoms. Tubers with soft and dry rot symptoms were observed, but symptoms of pink rot (Phytophthora erythroseptica) were not found. Four percent of the tubers showed late blight symptoms. Sections of 10 tubers with late blight symptoms were air-dried for 2 weeks in the laboratory and homogenized with a mortar and pestle. Glycerol was added to the homogenized tissue and observed microscopically. Aplerotic oospores (10 to 15 oospores per tuber) with amphyginous antheridia typical of P. infestans were observed. P. mirabilis morphologically similar to P. infestans is present in the area but it does not infect potato tubers. The number of oospores observed in our tuber sample was much lower than the number reported on leaflets (>1,000 oospores per leaflet) in the Toluca Valley. Low numbers of oospores have been reported on tubers artificially inoculated with P. infestans under field conditions (2). Infected tubers left in the field may act as a source of primary inoculum. To our knowledge, this is the first report of oospores of P. infestans found on tubers in Mexico under natural field conditions.

References: (1) M. E. Gallegly and J. Galindo. Phytopathology 48:274, 1958. (2) A. Levin et al. Phytopathology 91:579, 2001.



© 2002 The American Phytopathological Society