![]()

Potato Late Blight On-line
Workshop
The Fungus and the Disease
Discussion Forums
Genetics of the Fungus
A lot of headway has been made in understanding the genetics of P. infestans, and in developing techniques for the classical and molecular genetic analysis of the organism in the laboratory. But we are still in the early stages of exploiting those abilities.
What do we need to know about the genetics of P. infestans? Do we understand enough about the natural genetic cycles of the organism? Do we know enough about its genome, and just how much variability exists between different isolates? What can we do in the laboratory to identify genes that are important to the biology and pathology of the organism?
At the late blight meeting in Tucson, several areas for future research were suggested:
1. Identify genotypic diversity in P. infestans populations nationwide, so that scientists and growers know as much as possible about the populations they are dealing with. This may require the development of improved genetic markers for P. infestans.
2. Evaluate the role of recombination in generating new types of P. infestans, to indicate the likelihood of new variants developing and guide studies of epidemiology.
3. Expand our understanding of the genetics of host-pathogen interactions, to understand host specificity, virulence, and aggressiveness in P. infestans.
4. Drastically increase efforts to advance the basic genetics (and biology!) of the P. Infestans system to allow us to make inroads in the above subject areas.
What else do we need to do and what are the highest priorities?
Howard Judelson - 05:29pm Feb 20, 1997
A lot of the research in P. infestans is going to be
genome-based, and to assist this process genetic maps, libraries
and other tools are being developed in several labs. But this
raises an important question: how much variability is there going
to be between isolates? The sexual cycle is not very frequent in P.
infestans, so there has not been much selection for
conservation of genome structure, gene order, etc. Does anyone
have any insight into this potential problem?
Steve Goodwin - 06:24pm Feb 20, 1997
Although the sexual cycle is infrequent outside Mexico,
within Mexico it probably occurs every year. Therefore, isolates
from sexually reproducing populations in central Mexico may have
a more uniform genome organization - using isolates from outside
Mexico is asking for trouble. We know that aneuploidy, at least
for the chromosome containing the Gpi locus, occurs commonly even
in field isolates (e.g., US-8 and US-11), so I think it will be
necessary to screen even isolates from central Mexico for
aneuploidy. But I don't know of an easy way to do that, except
with a battery of highly polymorphic co-dominant markers.
Thomas Randall - 04:12pm Feb 27, 1997
Metalaxyl resistance seems to have spread around the world
quite rapidly, since a high frequency of isolates in different
regions throughout the world are resistant. Does anybody have an
idea of how this resistance is being spread or how often
resistance can spontateously develop. Is the same locus
responsible for different populations of resistant P. infestans
or are there a variety of loci which can cause resistance? Along
the same lines, has anyone done much on how new isolates of P.
infestans get distributed and established at different places.
Didier Andrivon - 12:59am Mar 5, 1997
Thomas,
I know of very little work dealing with the genetics of metalaxyl
resistance, except that of Richard Shattock (he found resistance
to be monogenic, if I recall correctly). It's difficult to get
really positive about resistance genetics in P. infestans, for at
least two reasons: first, genetic analysis in P. infestans is not
really straightforward, due to the low germination rate of
oospores which might bias the ratios in progeny testing; second,
as far as I'm aware, the work on metalaxyl resistance genetics
was done with isolates that were either sensitive or highly
resistant to the chemical. Right now, we see a great deal of
sensitivity levels in current populations, which might mean a
polygenic inheritance for resistance. Since resistance arose very
rapidly after the chemical was released for commercial use, and
can be found in many different lineages (including 'old' ones) I
would tend to think that variation (or at least potential
variation) for metalaxyl resistance is no problem at all for the
fungus to develop.
Jean Ristaino - 11:01am Mar 27, 1997
We (Fraser, Shoemaker and Ristaino) have observed variation
in sensitivity to metalaxyl in populations of P. infestans in
North Carolina tomato fields. Isolates are not either resistant
or sensitive but exhibit a range of variation in sensitivity to
the fungicide. We have also found a few isolates that were US-7
and US-8 by allozyme genotyping that were sensitive to metalaxyl.
This means that allozyme genotype alone can not be used as a
measure of sensitivity unless you are dealing with US-1 which
always appears sensitive to the fungicide.
Didier Andrivon - 01:20am Mar 28, 1997
Jean,
I totally agree with you on the point that allozyme genotypes are
not saying much about metalaxyl sensitivity, and I would extend
this remark to US-1 as well as to the newer genotypes. We tested
here some isolates collected in South Africa by Freddie Denner,
and all showed allozymes typical of US-1. These isolates showed
all the different metalaxyl sensitivities we're able to detect
with our leaf disk test. I don't think there is any good reason
why US-1 could not evolve metalaxyl resistance if selection for
it is present.
Howard Judelson - 08:14pm Apr 1, 1997
Dear Phytophthorologists:
There is lots of concern about having the A1 and A2 types
together in the same region, since that could lead to
recombination and the development of new genotypes. But how about
the parasexual cycle? There are a few studies, mostly from the
60s and 70s, that suggest that some form of somatic fusion can
take place between isolates of the same mating type. Are there
any newer data that indicates how common somatic fusion is?
© Copyright 1997 by the American Phytopathological Society