|
Origins and importance of
banana as a food crop
Banana is one of the most
fascinating and important of all crops. It is a large monocotyledenous herb that
originated in Southeast Asia. Virtually all of the cultivars that are grown are thought to
have been selected as naturally occurring hybrids in this region by the earliest of
farmers. In fact, Norman Simmonds proposed that banana was one of the first crops to be
domesticated by man. In writing of the beginnings of agriculture in Southeast Asia, he
concluded, "It seems a reasonable assumption that the bananas evolved along with the
earliest settled agriculture of that area and may therefore be some tens of thousands of
years old."
Despite the current, clear understanding of its
ancestry, the edible bananas' origins are often confused in the
literature. Almost all of the 300 or more cultivars that are known arose
from two seeded, diploid species, Musa acuminata Colla and M.
balbisiana Colla; they are diploid, triploid and tetraploid hybrids
among subspecies of M. acuminata, and between M. acuminata
and M. balbisiana.
Conventionally, the haploid contributions of the
respective species to the cultivars are noted with an A and B. For
example, the Cavendish cultivars that are the mainstays of the export
trades are pure triploid acuminata and, thus, AAA. The Linnaean
species M. paradisiaca (the AAB plantains) and M. sapientum
(the sweet dessert bananas, of which Silk AAB is the type cultivar) are
invalid and no longer used.
|

|

|
|
Women selling fruit of Dwarf Cavendish AAA
and Pisang awak ABB in a market in Karonga, Malawi, East Africa.
The lower photograph shows preparation of male buds of Pisang awak for
cooking in a market in Sungai Kolok, Thailand. For many of the world’s
poorest people, banana is a nutritious and important staple food.
Click images for enlargement. |
Banana is now one of the most popular of
all fruits. Although it is viewed as only a dessert or an addition to
breakfast cereal in most developed countries, it is actually a very
important agricultural product. After rice, wheat and milk, it is the
fourth most valuable food. In export, it ranks fourth among all
agricultural commodities and is the most significant of all fruits, with
world trade totaling $2.5 billion annually. Yet, only 10% of the annual
global output of 86 million tons enters international commerce. Much of
the remaining harvest is consumed by poor subsistence farmers in
tropical Africa, America and Asia. For most of the latter producers,
banana and plantain (which is a type of banana) are staple foods that
represent major dietary sources of carbohydrates, fiber, vitamins A, B6
and C, and potassium, phosphorus and calcium.

|
This photograph shows
seed-packed fruit of Musa balbisiana, one of the ancestors of the edible bananas.
Since the edible cultivars are parthenocarpic and often female or male sterile, seeds are
rarely found in their fruit. The latter factors, however, have made it difficult to
improve this crop by breeding. |
Impact of banana diseases
Diseases are among
the most important factors in banana production worldwide. They
are the reasons for which all of the worlds breeding programs
were created and remain a primary focus of all current programs.
Recently, diseases also became principal targets of biotechnological
efforts to improve this crop ( http://www.techcentralstation.com/010504E.html
and www-cgi.cnn.com/TECH/science/9807/24/t_t/banana.science/index.html
).
A leaf spot disease
is the most important of these problems. Black Sigatoka, which is also known
as black leaf streak, causes significant reductions in
leaf area, yield losses of 50% or more, and premature ripening, a serious defect in
exported fruit. It is more damaging and difficult to control than the related yellow
Sigatoka disease, and has a wider host range that includes the plantains and dessert and
ABB cooking bananas that are usually not affected by yellow Sigatoka.
|
A close-up of the adaxial surface of a banana leaf that is affected
by black Sigatoka. Under high rainfall and humidity, these lesions will coalesce and kill
the entire leaf. Click image for enlargement. |
Damage caused by black
Sigatoka in a planting of Dwarf Cavendish AAA in Malawi, East Africa. Note the scarcity of
healthy leaf tissue on plants that carry fruit. Yields from such plants are usually a half
or less than that from healthy plants.
Click image for enlargement. |
|
In export plantations,
Black
Sigatoka is controlled with frequent applications of fungicides and cultural
practices, such as the removal of affected leaves, and adequate spacing of
plants and efficient drainage within plantation. In total, these are very
expensive practices. For example, fungicide application includes the use of airplanes or helicopters, permanent landing strips
and facilities for mixing and loading the fungicides, and the high recurring expense of
the spray materials themselves. In total, it has been estimated that the
costs of control are
ultimately responsible for 15-20% of the final retail price of these fruit in the importing
countries. Their great expense makes them essentially
unavailable to small-holder farmers who grow this crop, it is these producers who are
affected most by this important disease.
|
Aerial application of fungicides to control
black Sigatoka in Honduras. In the final analysis, the costs associated with these control
measures are directly responsible for 15-20% of the purchase price of exported fruit in the
importing countries. (Photo courtesy of R.H. Stover)
Click image for enlargement. |
Distribution,
etiology and epidemiology of black Sigatoka
Black Sigatoka was first recognized
in the Sigatoka Valley of Fiji in 1963, but was probably widespread in Southeast Asia and
the South Pacific by that time. In the Western Hemisphere, it first appeared in 1972 in
Honduras and now occurs on the mainland from central Mexico south to Bolivia and
northwestern Brazil, and in the Caribbean basin in Cuba, Jamaica, the Dominican Republic
and southern Florida. In Africa, the disease was first recorded in Zambia in 1973 and has
since spread throughout the sub-Saharan portions of that continent. In most areas, black
Sigatoka has now replaced yellow Sigatoka to become the predominant leaf spot disease of
banana.
Black Sigatoka is caused by the
ascomycete, Mycosphaerella fijiensis Morelet [anamorph: Paracercospora fijiensis
(Morelet) Deighton] (a variant of the pathogen, M. fijiensis var. difformis,
that was previously reported in tropical America, is no longer recognized). The pathogen produces conidia and ascospores, both of which are
infective. They are formed under high moisture conditions, and are
disseminated by wind, and in the case of conidia, also by rain and
irrigation water. Due to their greater abundance and small size, ascospores are more
important than conidia in spreading the disease within plants and plantations. In
contrast, infected planting material and leaves, which are used often in the developing
world as packing materials, are usually responsible for the long-distance spread of the
disease. The recent outbreak of black Sigatoka in South Florida almost certainly resulted
from the importation of infected germplasm by local growers
(see Plant
Disease note D-1998-1217-03N).
 |
"Damn, how did this get here?" Dr. Jonathan Crane,
Extension Tropical Fruit Crops Specialist for the University of Florida in Homestead,
examines a leaf of the banana cultivar Rajapuri AAB that is affected by black Sigatoka.
The importation of infected propagation material, which is a common and effective means
for moving this disease long distances, was probably responsible for the recent outbreak
of black Sigatoka in South Florida. Click image for
enlargement.
|
Control
Chemical control of first yellow,
and then black, Sigatoka has evolved considerably over the last 65 years. Bordeaux
mixture, first used in the mid-1930s, has been replaced by several succeeding generations
of protectant and, later, systemic fungicides. Presently, a
sterol biosynthesis inhibitor, tridemorph, several different sterol
demethylation inhibitors, most importantly propiconazole, and the
methoxyacrylate, azoxystrobin, are the most commonly used systemics.
Since there is a tendency for resistance or
tolerance to develop in M. fijiensis towards the systemic fungicides,
they are usually applied in combination or alternation with broad-spectrum,
protectant fungicides, such as the dithiocarbamates and chlorothalonil. With
the exception of chlorothalonil, these fungicides are usually mixed with
petroleum-based spray oils. The oils themselves are fungistatic and retard
the development of the pathogen in the infected leaf. When they are mixed in
water emulsions with fungicides, the resulting “cocktails” provide
superior disease control.
The export plantations in the Philippines
and Central and South America that produce fruit for the developed world
are vast monocultures of Cavendish cultivars, usually of Grand Nain but
also of Williams and Valery. In order to treat these large areas with
fungicides, helicopters or fixed wing aircraft are used. Application
schedules in the plantations are routinely determined with
disease-forecast systems that incorporate data on disease severity
within the plantation and environmental factors that are known to affect
infection and disease development. These epidemiological tools enabled
producers in Central America to substantially reduce the number of
fungicide applications that were needed for control. However, increased
tolerance in the pathogen to the DMI fungicides has made it necessary to
increase applications in several countries in the region to previous
frequencies of 25 - 40 per year.
|
Aerial view of an export plantation of the Cavendish cultivar Grand
Nain in the Sula Valley of Honduras. Such vast monocultures allow fruit to be produced
efficiently, but require that fungicides for black Sigatoka control be applied by
aircraft. Click image for enlargement.
|
 |
The annual cost of fungicide
applications in export plantations is about $1,000 per hectare. Although
the international trades can add this expense to the price they charge
for fruit, this is not an option for subsistence farmers. Thus, the
latter producers must use different strategies to manage black Sigatoka.
These include the removal of older leaves to reduce inoculum levels in a
plantation, interplanting with other nonsusceptible crops, and planting
in partial shade which results in less severe disease development.
The potential for bred bananas
Given the high expense of fungicides, their
unavailability for subsistence farmers, and the recurring problem with
fungicide resistance in the export plantations, it is clear that genetic
resistance to black Sigatoka would be most useful. If resistant,
agronomically acceptable cultivars were available, they would provide the
best solution to this problem in export and subsistence situations alike.
Unfortunately,
resistance to black Sigatoka among pre-existing banana genotypes
is poor. The Cavendish cultivars that are used for export are so
susceptible that nothing short of intensive fungicide application
will control the disease in most areas. Resistant cultivars that
could be used in subsistence situations are available, but they
are usually less productive or desirable than those that are susceptible.
This situation has begun to change as a result of new, resistant
hybrids that are being developed by the banana breeding programs
(http://www.promusa.org
).
The first program to
make significant progress in improving this crop was that of the
Fundación Hondureña de Investigación Agrícola (FHIA http://www.honduras.com/fhia/espamenu.htm)
in La Lima, Honduras. It was begun by the United
Fruit Company (now Chiquita Brands http://www.chiquita.com)
in 1959, but was donated to this private agricultural research foundation
in 1984. FHIA has developed numerous dessert, plantain and cooking
hybrids, several of which have been tested in the International
Musa Testing Programme of the International Network for the
Improvement of Banana and Plantain (http://bananas.bioversityinternational.org/).
Results from these and other trials indicate that the FHIA clones
are generally very vigorous and produce high yields under a wide
range of environmental and edaphic conditions. Importantly, they
resist pathogenically and geographically diverse populations of
M. fijiensis, as well as two other major problems, Panama
disease, (fusarium wilt) and nematodes. Unfortunately,
since they do not yet meet the high standards of the export trades,
they have only been adopted for local consumption in East Africa,
tropical America and the Caribbean.
In the future, products of the
breeding programs will play increasingly important roles in subsistence agriculture.
Whether new hybrids are used eventually to replace the Cavendish cultivars that are used
by the export trades, however, remains to be seen. The very substantial infrastructure
that characterizes export production is focussed on producing only these cultivars.
Converting these operations to the production and handling of another type of banana would
be an expensive proposition. Moreover, the currently available hybrids do not meet the
very high standards for fruit quality and post-harvest shelflife that are demanded by the
trades. Yet, as fungicides continue to lose their effectiveness against black Sigatoka,
and as the practice of fungicidal disease control becomes more expensive and less
appealing to consumers in the importing countries, the trades may eventually be forced
into making the difficult transition away from the Cavendish clones.
References
Carlier, J., X. Mourichon,
D. Gonzâlez de León, M.F. Zapater, and M.H Lebrun. 1994. DNA restriction fragment
length polymorphisms in Mycosphaerella species that cause banana leaf spot
diseases. Phytopathology 84:751-756.
Carreel, F., S.
Fauré, D. Gonzâlez de León, P.J.L. Lagoda, X. Perrier, F. Bakry, H. Tezenas du
Montcel, C. Lanaud, and J.P. Horry. 1994. Évaluation de la diversité génétique chez les
bananiers diploïdes (Musa spp.). Genet. Sel. Evol. 26:125s-136s.
Fullerton, R.A., and
R.H. Stover (eds.). 1990. Sigatoka Leaf Spot Diseases of Banana: Proceedings of an International
Workshop held at San José, Costa Rica, 28 March 1 April, 1989.
INIBAP.
Montpellier, France. 374 pp.
Gauhl, F. 1994. Epidemiology and
Ecology of Black Sigatoka (Mycosphaerella fijiensis Morlet) on Plantain and Banana
(Musa spp.) in Costa Rica, Central America. Ph.D. dissertation, Universität
Göttingen, 1989. (translated to English from German by INIBAP, Montpellier, France). 120
pp.
International Network for the
Improvement of Banana and Plantain. 1994. Annual Report, 1993. Montpellier, France. 73 pp.
Kress, W.J. 1990. The phylogeny
and classification of the Zingiberales. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden
77:698-721.
Mourichon, X., J.
Carlier, and Fouré. 1997. Sigatoka leaf spot diseases. Musa Disease Fact Sheet No. 8.
INIBAP,
Montpellier, France. 4 pp.
Ortiz, R. 1995. Musa
genetics. In: Gowen, S. (ed.) Bananas and Plantains. Chapman & Hall. London. pp.
84-109
Ploetz, R.C., and X.
Mourichon.
1999. First report of black Sigatoka in Florida. (Disease Note) Plant Disease
83:300.
Rhodes, P.L. 1964. A new banana
disease in Fiji. Commonwealth Phytopathological News 10:38-41.
Simmonds, N.W. and K.
Shepherd.
1955. Taxonomy and origins of cultivated bananas. Journal of the Linneaen Society of
Botany (London) 55:302-312.
Simmonds, N.W. 1966. Bananas. 2nd
edition. Longmans. London. 512 pp.
Stover, R.H. 1980. Sigatoka leaf
spot diseases of bananas and plantains. Plant Disease 64:750-756.
©
Copyright 2001 by The American Phytopathological Society.
This article was first published March 1, 1999. It was reviewed,
revised, and published as a feature article for The Plant Health
Instructor January 29, 2001.
American
Phytopathological Society
3340 Pilot Knob Road
St. Paul, MN 55121-2097
e-mail: aps@scisoc.org |