|

Return to
feature story
|
|
APSnet
Education Center | Feature Article - Burkholderia
cepacia: Friend or Foe?
Large
replicons in different
B. cepacia isolatesa, b
| Strain c |
Large Replicons (Mb) |
Overall Genome Size (Mb) |
| Genomovar I |
|
|
| ATCC 25416 (CEP031) |
3.5, 3.1, 1 |
7.7 |
| ATCC 17759 (CEP080) |
3.5, 3.3, 1.1 |
7.9 |
| CEP521 |
3.7, 2.0 |
5.7 |
| Genomovar II (B. multivorans) |
|
|
| C3430 |
3.6, 2.1 |
6.1 |
| C5274 |
3.3, 2.4, 1.3 |
7.0 |
| C5393 |
3.1, 2.0 |
5.1 |
| C5568 |
3.4, 2.2 |
5.6 |
| ATCC 17616 (CEP144) |
3.4, 2.5, 0.9 |
6.8 |
| LMG14280 (FC365) |
3.3, 2.2, 0.8 |
6.3 |
| LMG14293 (FC366) |
3.5, 2.2 |
5.7 |
| Genomovar III |
|
|
| C4455 |
3.9, 3.0, 1.0 |
7.9 |
| C5424 |
3.7, 3.0, 0.8 |
7.5 |
| C6433 |
3.9, 3.3, 0.9 |
8.1 |
| CEP024 |
3.4, 2.7, 0.9 |
7.0 |
| CEP511 |
3.4, 2.6, 1.2 |
7.2 |
| LMG12614 (FC363) |
3.8, 3.0, 1.1 |
7.9 |
| LMG12615 (FC364) |
3.7, 2.9, 1.1 |
7.7 |
| Genomovar IV |
|
|
| FC362 |
3.9, 3.3, 1.4 |
8.6 |
| LMG14294 (FC367) |
3.7, 3.2, 1.3 |
8.2 |
| Genomovar V (B. vietnamensis) |
|
|
| CEP040 |
3.3, 2.3, 1.1 |
6.7 |
| LMG10929 (FC369) |
3.9, 2.6, 1.4 |
7.5 |
| |
|
|
| Genomovar unknown |
|
|
| ATCC 53617 (G4) |
3.4, 3.2, 1.2, 1.1 |
8.9 |
| CRE7 |
3.4, 3.2, 1.3 |
7.9 |
| BcF |
3.5, 2.6, 1.3 |
7.4 |
| ATCC 29424 (DB01) |
3.4, 2.4, 1.3 |
7.1 |
| BC11 |
3.5, 2.8, 0.7 |
7.0 |
| 542 |
3.4, 3.0 |
6.4 |
| 67-46 |
3.6, 1.8 |
5.4 |
| ATCC 17760 (383) |
3.4, 1.3 |
4.7 |
| SW3 |
3.5, 1.1 |
4.6 |
| a
Randomly linearized replicons were resolved by CHEF gel electrophoresis for 160h @ 2V/cm
with ramping between 700 and 2800 sec. Replicons smaller than 0.5 Mb are not shown. |
| b Data accumulated by F. Yao and T.G. Lessie, University of
Massachusetts, Amherst, MA (USA) |
| c All strains with specified genomovars were from the panel
of isolates assembled by P. Vandamme (University of Ghent, Belgium) and E.
Mahenthiralingam, D. Speert, and D. Henry (University of British Columbia, Vancouver,
Canada). Strain Bcf was from D. Roberts, USDA Lab, Beltsville, MD. Other strains are
listed in Lessie et al. 1996. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 144: 117-128. |
© Copyright
2000 by The American
Phytopathological Society
|